|
|
Lifespan's A - Z Health Information Library |
|||||||||||||
Non-small cell lung cancerHighlightsAbout The Disease Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) include three cell types: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. In the early stages, surgery can treat all three types.
Symptoms Lung cancer usually does not produce symptoms until the disease is advanced. Early symptoms may include coughing, weight loss, fever, shortness of breath, and chest pain. Treatment News:
IntroductionAlthough lung cancer accounts for only 13% of all cancers, it is among the most lethal, accounting for over 28% of all cancer deaths. It is more deadly than colon, breast, and prostate cancers combined. An estimated 162,460 people will die from lung cancer in 2006. Death rates have been declining in men over the past decade, and they have now stabilized in women. The LungsThe lungs are two spongy organs surrounded by a thin moist membrane called the pleura. Each lung is composed of smooth, shiny lobes: the right lung has three lobes and the left has two. About 90% of the lung is filled with air; only 10% is solid tissue.
![]() The major features of the lungs include the bronchi, the bronchioles and the alveoli. The alveoli are the microscopic blood vessel-lined sacks in which oxygen and carbon dioxide gas are exchanged. Lung CancerLung cancer develops when genetic mutations (changes) occur in a normal cell within the lung. As a result, the cell becomes abnormal in shape and behavior, and reproduces endlessly. The abnormal cells form a tumor that, if not surgically removed, invades neighboring blood vessels and lymph nodes and spreads to nearby sites. Eventually, the cancer can spread (metastasize) to locations throughout the body. The two major categories of lung cancer are small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Most lung cancers are non-small cell cancers, which are the subjects of this report. Less common cancers of the lung are known as carcinoids, cylindromas, and certain sarcomas (cancer in soft tissues). Some experts believe all primary lung cancers originate from a single common malignant (cancerous) stem cell that, as it copies itself, can develop into any one of these cancer types in different individuals. In addition, cancers in the lung may have spread (metastasized) from other primary sites, such as the breast, thyroid, or colon. In these cases, doctors name the cancer after its original location; for example, "breast cancer with lung metastases." Non-Small Cell Lung CancersNon-small cell lung cancers are categorized into three types: squamous cell carcinoma (also called epidermoid carcinoma), adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. These separate types are grouped together because, in early stages before the cancers have spread, they all can be treated surgically. Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Squamous cells are formed from reserve cells, which are round cells that replace injured or damaged cells in the lining (the epithelium) of the bronchi, the major airways. Tumors formed from squamous cells are usually found in the center of the lung, either in a major lobe or in one of the main airway branches. They may grow to large sizes and form cavities in the lungs. When squamous cell cancer metastasizes, it may travel to the bone, adrenal glands, liver, small intestine, and brain. Squamous cell carcinoma is nearly always caused by smoking and used to be the most common cancer. It still makes up between 25% and 40% of all lung cancers. Adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinomas usually arise from the mucus-producing cells in the lung. About two-thirds of adenocarcinomas develop in the outer regions of the lung, while one-third develops in the center of the lung. In 1965, 12% of lung cancers were adenocarcinomas. They are now estimated to account for 30% to 50% of all lung cancers and are the most common lung cancers in many countries. It is the most common lung cancer in women. In fact, a 2000 European study showed that nearly 34% of the women with lung cancer under investigation had adenocarcinoma, compared to 26.4% who had squamous cell carcinoma, and 22.3% with small cell lung cancer. Adenocarcinoma is also increasing dramatically in men. Until recently, adenocarcinoma was only weakly linked to smoking. Experts now suggest, however, that the dramatic increase in recent decades in this lung cancer type may be due to low-tar, filtered cigarettes. People who smoke them draw tiny particles deeper into the lungs, thereby possibly increasing the risk for adenocarcinoma. The course of this cancer varies widely. Most often, it develops slowly and causes few or no symptoms until it is far advanced. In some cases, however, it can be extremely aggressive and rapidly fatal. In 50% of cases in which this cancer spreads, it spreads only to the brain. Other common locations it spreads to include the other lung, the liver, the adrenal glands, and bone. Bronchoalveolar Lung Cancer. Bronchoalveolar lung cancer is actually a subtype of adenocarcinoma. It develops as a layer of column-like cells on the lung and spreads through the airways, causing great volumes of sputum. This cancer also is increasing in incidence. Large Cell Carcinoma. Large cell carcinoma, which makes up about 10% to 20% of lung cancers, includes cancers that cannot be identified under the microscope as squamous cell cancers or adenocarcinomas. Small Cell Lung CancerSmall cell lung cancer may, like squamous cells, be derived from reserve cells or other cells in the epithelium. It causes between 15% and 25% of all lung cancers; without chemotherapy, it is very aggressive and is usually rapidly fatal. It requires a different treatment approach from non-small cell lung cancer, so it is not discussed in this report. CausesCigarette Smoke. Smoking causes 87% of all cases of lung cancer, accounting for 28% of all cancer deaths. Cigarettes, nicotine, or both may contribute to lung cancer in one or more of the following ways: ![]() In general, chronic exposure to nicotine may cause an acceleration of coronary artery disease, peptic ulcer disease, reproductive disturbances, esophageal reflux, hypertension, fetal illnesses and death, and delayed wound healing.
Radon. Radon is a gas produced naturally by the breakdown of uranium. It is often present in the soil and in water and can seep into any dwelling. Radon may be responsible for between 10% and 14% of lung cancer deaths, making it, after smoking, the second leading cause of this cancer. Other Contributors. Toxic particles leading to precancerous changes in the lung are also found in marijuana. In one study, 53.8% of cigarette smokers, 66.7% of marijuana smokers, and all of those subjects who smoked both substances showed evidence of precancerous changes in the lungs. There is considerable debate over the lung cancer risk posed by depleted uranium used in military weapons (e.g., in the Gulf and Balkan conflicts). A 2001 study estimated that it would cause an additional 8 deaths from lung cancer out of every 10,000 people or soldiers who were highly exposed to this substance. The study was based on a mathematical model, however, and the issue is not settled. Other lung carcinogens include asbestos, arsenic, certain petrochemicals (materials made from crude oil or natural gas), and other airborne (carried through the air) byproducts of various mining and manufacturing processes. Genetic Mutations
Damage to either type of gene can cause a mutation that results in an uncontrolled division of cells. This uncontrolled division forms tumors. It is unlikely that a single specific abnormality causes all cases of lung cancer. It probably takes a variety of mutations to start the devastating chain of events leading to cancer. The following mutations are among those under investigation:
SymptomsLung cancer is unlikely to produce symptoms until the disease is advanced. When symptoms develop, they may result from the lung tumor itself, from its effects on tissues outside the lung, or from the spread of malignant cells to other organs. Early SymptomsEarly symptoms may include the following:
Symptoms of Later StagesLater-stage symptoms include the following:
Other lung cancers (usually small cell cancer) cause the body to retain water, lowering the blood's sodium levels. This condition, called hyponatremia, can produce confusion, weakness, and even seizures. Risk FactorsBefore cigarettes became popular in the beginning of the 20th century, lung cancer was rare. This year, lung cancer is expected to strike up to 174,470 Americans, and about 162,460 are expected to die from it. The disease usually appears in people over 50 years old. Men have a significantly greater incidence of lung cancer compared to women. On the encouraging side, the rate of lung cancer in men has been declining significantly over the past decade. While lung cancer rates have been increasing dramatically in women (by 600% from 1950 to 2000), they now appear to be stabilizing. Smokers and Those Exposed to Cigarette SmokeSmoking appears to be the primary risk factor in 85% to 90% of lung cancers. About 15% of all people who smoke develop lung cancer. The risk depends on the duration of the addiction and the number of pack years (one pack year equals the number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day, multiplied by the number of years that the person has smoked). Genetic damage in the lung occurs in nearly all chronic smokers, even if cancer has not developed. An elevated risk for lung cancer can persist for more than 20 years after quitting smoking, although the risk drops significantly even in the first year after quitting. And, there are benefits to quitting smoking even for people who are well into middle age.
Second-Hand Smoke. The Environmental Protection Agency has classified second-hand smoke as a carcinogen (cancer-causing chemical). A number of studies have suggested that exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke may increase the risk of lung cancer in the nonsmoker by about 25%. Still, other studies suggest that the effects of second-hand smoke on adults may be highly over-estimated. A 2003 study in California on smokers and their spouses, for example, found no significant relationship between second-hand smoke and a higher risk for tobacco-related deaths, heart disease, or lung cancer. It should be strongly stressed, however, that the harmful effects of parental smoking on children are fairly well established, and that no one should smoke. Ethnic DifferencesThere appears to be some ethnic differences in lung cancer risk. For example, African Americans face a risk that is two to four times higher than that in Caucasians, regardless of smoking status. It is not clear what factors are responsible for this higher risk. Some African Americans appear to have a genetic vulnerability to the harmful chemicals in cigarette smoke. In China, an estimated one third of all young male smokers will eventually die because of tobacco-related illnesses. Their risk for lung cancer, however, is much less than it is for chronic lung disease, the opposite of the Western trend. A 2001 study reported that the lower rate of lung cancer among Chinese people might be due to a slow rate of clearing nicotine, which results in smoking fewer cigarettes. Environmental FactorsPeople with High Exposure to Radon. Studies have shown that radon raises the risk of lung cancer in underground miners by 40%. It is unclear whether the results of these studies would apply to people exposed to radon in their homes One study suggests that people with intense or prolonged exposure to radon in their homes do indeed face the same risk as miners exposed to similar levels of radon. A cumulative long-term exposure to radon and smoking also increases the danger. Most people move an average of 10 or 11 times over their lifetime, so the risk of developing lung cancer through radon exposure is very low in most individuals, even for those who lived for awhile in areas with high radon levels. People with homes that have high radon levels and those who sleep or spend many hours to days in basements with detectable but moderate levels should consider taking protective measures. Workers Highly Exposed to Carcinogens. An estimated 9,000 to 10,000 men and 900 to 1,900 women develop lung cancer each year because of occupational exposure to carcinogens. More than half of these cases are attributable to past exposure to asbestos, which has long been known to be a risk factor for mesothelioma (cancer of the pleura, the lining around the lung) and can increase the risk of lung cancer in smokers. With better protective measures, these rates are expected to fall in the future. Other chemicals that put workers at risk for lung cancer include:
By contrast, agricultural workers seem to have a lower lung cancer rate, despite their possible occupational exposures to risky chemicals. While this rate has traditionally been attributed to good health habits, including low tobacco use, a 2000 study suggests that agricultural workers' exposure to endotoxin may be responsible. Endotoxin is a component of common bacteria found in soil and animals and may have cancer-preventing effects on the immune system. Exposure to Smoke from Grills. Grilling and high-heat frying emit chemicals called heterocyclic amines, which are known to be carcinogenic. A 2000 study of Chinese women found that smokers who stir-fried meat daily and inhaled cooking fumes had a higher risk of lung cancer than did those who stir-fried meat less frequently. No higher risk was found among nonsmokers. Air Pollution. Although any risk from air pollution is very small, it nevertheless may be a contributor to those lung cancers not obviously related to smoking. Some studies, including a major analysis of vital statistics in 2002, have found an association between increased risk for lung cancer and long-term exposure to very small particulates, especially sulfates, present in polluted air. The risk, if any, is very small. Family HistoryA family history of lung cancer may play a role in increasing susceptibility to this disease. In one study, people with parents or siblings with respiratory tract cancers had a 30% higher risk for lung cancer than people without a family history, and women with mothers or sisters with lung cancer had triple the risk. A higher risk occurred in both smokers and nonsmokers. There was no association between a history of other cancers and lung cancer. Both genetic factors and secondary smoke appeared to contribute to the danger in these individuals. Other Diseases that Increase RiskSmokers with emphysema or chronic inflammatory lung diseases, such as asthma, are at increased risk for lung cancer. Both smokers and nonsmokers whose lungs are scarred from recurrent lung diseases, such as pneumonia or tuberculosis, are also at increased risk, particularly for bronchoalveolar lung cancer. Lifestyle ChangesQuitting SmokingQuitting improves lung function almost immediately. Some evidence suggests that the benefits for the lungs are even more significant for women who quit than for men. It should be noted, however, that it can take 20 years or longer, particularly in heavy smokers, for the lungs to be restored to a fully healthy condition in which the risk is as low as nonsmokers. Quitting is extremely difficult. No one should be discouraged if they relapse. Everyone should keeping trying to quit. With continued efforts, many people succeed. ![]() The many methods of quitting smoking include counseling and support groups, nicotine patches, gums and sprays, and incremental reduction. At this time perhaps the most effective method for quitting is a combination of the following:
For more information, see In-Depth Report #41, Smoking. While people are in the process of quitting (and afterwards), they should maintain as healthy a lifestyle as possible. Dietary FactorsPhytochemicals. Some data suggests that diets rich in fresh fruits and vegetables may be protective against lung cancer in both smokers and non-smokers. Some studies have reported protection from specific food chemicals (phytochemicals), such as the following:
Note: Studies on these chemicals are not consistent. It is unlikely that individual phytochemicals offer protection, but rather that the benefits come from a collection of vitamins and plant chemicals contained in fruits and vegetables. Fruit, especially, appears to be protective. Fats and Oils. Some studies have indicated that diets high in animal fats increase the risk for lung cancer. Others have suggested some protection from cod liver oil, which contains omega-3 fatty acids (found in fatty fish), omega-6 fatty acids (found in flax and in soybean and canola oils), and monounsaturated oils (found in olive and canola oils). Of interest was a 2002 study reporting that women who had a high intake of cheese had a lower risk of lung cancer. Despite these intriguing pieces of information, the ability of these substances to protect against lung cancer remains controversial, and discontinuation of smoking remains the best advice. Vitamins Supplements. Even with a healthful diet, smoking reduces the levels of a number of vitamins, importantly vitamin C. There is no evidence, however, to support any protection from antioxidant supplements, including vitamins E, A, or beta carotene. In fact, evidence is now suggesting that high doses of vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta carotene supplements may have harmful effects. A 2000 study, for example, reported a higher risk for cancer in male smokers who took multivitamins plus A, C, or E. The strongest studies to date on negative effects of antioxidant supplements have reported an increase in lung cancer and overall mortality rates among smokers who took beta carotene supplements. In determining reasons for this disturbing effect, one animal study suggested that beta carotene increased enzymes in the lungs that actually promote cancerous changes. In other words, antioxidants may actually be harmful in people who already harbor cancer cells. This is particularly important information for smokers, who may carry precancerous or cancerous cells for years prior to developing the disease. The best way of achieving healthy levels of important nutrients is from healthy foods. Trace Elements Supplements. Trace elements may be important in cancer risk and prevention. Selenium appears to inhibit cell proliferation and may have other anti-cancer properties. A few studies have reported some protection with selenium. However, a major 2002 analysis supports previous work, indicating that taking selenium helps only people who are deficient to begin with. Zinc may prove to be more important than selenium. Some research suggests that zinc may help protect smokers by blocking cadmium. Smokers have higher levels of cadmium in their body, and there may be a link between cadmium and a higher risk for lung cancer. Some laboratory studies have indicated that zinc might help protect against tumor progression. There is no evidence that taking zinc supplements will reduce the risk for lung cancer, however. ExerciseA 2003 study reported a lower risk in lung cancer in men and women who were physically active. Both moderate and intensive exercises were associated with protection. Protecting the Home Against RadonPeople concerned about radon in their home or area can purchase a test approved by the Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for removing radon include installing a soil suction system. It should be noted, however, that home prevention measures rarely reduce radon levels to zero. Simply sleeping by an open window reduces the risk. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and COX-2 Inhibitors (Coxibs)Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) both block cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes. NSAIDs block COX-1 and 2, and coxibs selectively block COX-2. Evidence now strongly suggests that the COX-2 enzyme plays a role in blood vessel growth (angiogenesis) that can feed lung cancers. NSAIDs. NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil), and naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn, Naprelan, Anaprox). These agents inhibit COX-2 but they also target another COX enzyme. Studies are now reporting an association between regular use of aspirin or other NSAIDs and a reduced risk for non-small cell lung cancer. COX-2 Inhibitors. The COX-2 inhibitors are more recent forms of NSAIDs. Currently, only celecoxib (Celebrex) is still on the market. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra) have been withdrawn from the market due to their high risk of causing strokes and heart attacks. Because they target the COX-2 enzyme specifically, researchers are focusing on these drugs for a possible role in treating lung cancer and preventing recurrence. Diagnostic TestsChest X-Rays. In a small percentage of cases, a routine chest x-ray reveals the first signs of lung cancer. Usually, however, symptoms of existing lung cancer, such as coughing, chest pain, and blood in the sputum, will lead to a chest x-ray. If non-small cell lung cancer is present, chest x-rays may show lesions (damaged or abnormal tissue) in the center of the lung, cavities formed by squamous cell carcinoma, or lace-like pattern of cells spreading through the lungs. By the time lung cancer is diagnosed by chest x-rays, however, it has often spread so far that it cannot be surgically cured. Four major studies found no survival benefits in early detection from chest x-rays and sputum screening. Regular screening for lung cancer using x-rays is therefore not currently recommended. Computed Tomography. Computed tomography (CT), particularly the specific technique called low-dose spiral (or helical) CT, is more effective than x-rays for detecting cancer in patients with suspected lung cancer. It is the standard imaging procedure for determining if and where the cancer has spread (metastasized). Surgeons also use CT scans to evaluate patients before lung surgery. ![]() CT stands for computerized tomography. In this procedure, a thin x-ray beam is rotated around the area of the body to be visualized. Using very complicated mathematical processes called algorithms, the computer is able to generate a 3-D image of a section through the body. CT scans are very detailed. The use of helical CT for early screening is still controversial. Studies of CT scans in smokers suggest that early screening will detect about 2% of lung cancers, and most of these in early stages. In the studies, 62 - 82% of the patients with stage 1A cancer (when the tumor has not spread yet) were still alive at 5 years. Neither study, however, was controlled (compared with other groups; for example, non-smokers). The survival figures were likely to be higher than in actual practice. The evidence regarding the survival benefits of early detection is not clear. Many experts are highly opposed to widespread screening for lung cancer. Some evidence, for example, suggests that lung cancer cells in non-small cell lung cancer are often very aggressive at microscopic levels (before a tumor is formed). If this were true, the cancer would be highly likely to have already spread, long before it was visible with CT scans. Moreover, some studies have found no association between tumor size at the time of diagnosis and survival times. On the other hand, some abnormalities detected by CT scans may actually be innocent, and such patients might be more likely to die from aggressive treatments than from the disorder itself. It should also be noted that about 98% of abnormalities seen on CT scans turn out to be benign. Even after rescreening, many scans will show suspicious areas that turn out to be harmless but will require invasive and expensive biopsies. Additional experience with CT scans, however, may allow experts to better determine which abnormalities are likely to be benign. High-risk individuals who are still interested in early screening with CT scans should ask their doctor about available clinical trials. Other Imaging Tests for Staging and Tracking CancerComputed tomography is the standard imaging procedure for determining if and where the cancer has spread (metastasized). Other imaging tests, however, may be useful for staging and tracking lung cancers (staging means finding out how advanced the cancer is). Positron Emission Tomography. Positron emission tomography (PET), specifically a technique known as FDG/PET, is the most accurate noninvasive test for detecting early lung cancer. It is also the best imaging technique for staging lung cancers, not only those located in the lungs, but also those that have spread, particularly into the space between the two lungs (the mediastinum). With this imaging test, the patient is first injected with a specially formulated liquid sugar (called FDG), and then viewed with a machine that records energy given off by tumor cells. PET is expensive and not widely available. However, its supporters suggest that it may prevent many unnecessary surgeries by identifying patients whose cancer has advanced past the stage at which surgery is helpful. There is some evidence that FDG/PET scan can detect a metabolic (processing) response to treatments that may help predict the outlook for the patient. Scintigraphy. Scintigraphy is an imaging procedure in which patients are administered low-level radioactive agents that bind to cancer cells, which then can be tracked by special cameras to reveal the cancer cells' location and intensity. Agents selected are those that can best bind successfully with specific tumor types. For example, a 2001 study of the binding agent 111In-DOTA-LAN demonstrated excellent results in identifying non-small cell lung tumors. This study further suggests the possibility of using such highly-targeted binding agents as lung cancer treatments. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an imaging procedure that uses radio wave energy, is frequently used instead of CT scanning to locate brain and bone metastases that can be associated with lung cancer. Biopsy ProceduresBiopsies of lung tissue are needed confirm lung cancer. This requires invasive procedures that may vary from simple needle aspiration to chest surgery. Needle Aspiration. Sometimes, a biopsy specimen is obtained by inserting a needle between the ribs, and then guiding it with the use of computed tomography scans, ultrasound, or fluoroscopy (a device allowing an x-ray view). Specific techniques include transbronchial or transthoracic needle aspiration (TBNA or TTNA) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (EUS-NA). Their use depends on how much of the area can be observed with less invasive imaging methods. There is a 5 -10% risk for bleeding or collapsed lung with needle aspiration. Thoracoscopy. Thoracoscopy is usually very effective for diagnosing cancer in the outer areas of the lungs, or those involving the pleura (membrane surrounding the lungs). This is a surgical procedure that uses a fiber-optic tube to view the area:
Bronchoscopy. To locate cancer that develops in the central areas and major airways of the lung (usually squamous or small cell cancer), bronchoscopy is typically performed. The procedure is done as follows:
Advances in this procedure, such as laser-induced fluorescence endoscopic bronchoscopy, may improve early detection of cancer. Bronchoscopy is usually very safe, but complications can occur; they include allergic reactions to the sedatives or anesthetics, asthma attacks in susceptible patients, and bleeding. Fever may follow the procedure. Mediastinoscopy. Mediastinoscopy uses a tube inserted between the lungs to locate the appropriate areas for biopsy. It is performed if the physician suspects that cancer has spread to nearby lymph nodes but has not yet metastasized. Laboratory TestsSputum Analysis for Presence of Cancer Cells. Some experts are now recommending an analysis of coughed-up sputum as a useful and cost-effective measure for identifying cancer cells, particularly those located in central areas of the lung. However, although sputum analysis appears to be as accurate as any other screening test currently conducted, it may miss cancers such as adenocarcinoma, which form in mucus-producing cells typically in the outer portion of the lungs. If a sputum analysis does not show cancer cells, but other signs of lung cancer are present, including blood in the sputum and suspicious areas on X-rays, then other tests are performed. Biomarkers. Biologic markers, called biomarkers, are high levels of substances that are released by tumors and indicate the presence of specific cancers. Biomarkers can be found in sputum, blood, and tissue samples. They can include enzymes, hormones, amino-acid compounds, antigens (identified by antibodies that specifically target them), growth factors, and other chemicals. Some biomarkers may prove to reveal the presence of cancer cells before they are evident on CT scans or other imaging tests. For example, genetic mutations, notably K-ras and p53, can now be detected in cells found in sputum, or cells taken during bronchoscopy. Such mutations occur only with cancerous changes and may enable early detection. Other markers that prove to be important for predicting aggressive cancers are high levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP9) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which are compounds involved with angiogenesis (the process in which blood vessels serving the tumor develop). Other TestsAs part of the doctor's initial examination, patients may have a pulmonary function test to evaluate lung health and capacity. In addition, since the heart and lungs are often involved in complications following lung cancer surgery, the doctor may be especially interested in taking a complete history of those systems in patients who might need surgery. Staging SystemsTests to Determine Cancer Stage. After diagnosing non-small cell lung cancer, the doctor makes treatment choices by determining the cancer's stage (how large the tumor is and how far the cancer has spread). To stage the cancer and determine other aspects of the disease, a number of tests are conducted:
Physical Examination. A detailed physical examination of the whole body is very important to identify or rule out the spread of cancer to other areas, and to determine the general condition of the patient. For example, questions about dizziness or headaches can help the doctor determine if the cancer has spread to the brain, while bone or joint pain might suggest that the cancer has spread to the bone. The doctor will also look for head and neck symptoms that might reveal the presence of other tumors. Also, according to a 2000 review, the patient's weight loss and ability to function are two very important factors for predicting survival following treatment. Patients who are mobile and have lost less than 10% of their pre-treatment weight tend to have better survival rates. Staging SystemsIn lung cancer, the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis is a major factor in determining how to treat the cancer, and how long the patient can expect to live. In general, survival is longest for patients with very early-stage disease and shortest for patients with very advanced disease that has spread to several regions of the body. Staging is based on the results of physical and surgical examinations, and laboratory and imaging tests, including biopsies.
The TNM categories then determine the stage (numbered 0 to IV), which indicates how advanced the cancer is.
Other Factors Determining Treatment Choices and OutcomeStaging factors are used to help determine treatment and outlook. The following suggest a more aggressive disease:
Researchers are always looking for more accurate ways to determine a treatment and outlook for lung cancer. For example, some research involves specific biomarkers and related blood vessel development within tumors. These markers might eventually help determine how aggressive a cancer is likely to be, and what the best treatment approach is. General Treatment Approach After StagingIf the cancer is still localized, surgery can produce five-year survival rates of up to 75% in stage I patients and up to 50% in stage II patients. Unfortunately, very few patients are diagnosed at such early stages. In locally advanced stages, the standard treatment is concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. However, even with this approach average survival times are less than two years. Even if an initial tumor has been surgically removed or irradiated, cancer recurrence rates are very high. The risk for recurrence is lower in smokers who quit after treatment. On an encouraging note, advances in therapies for later stage lung cancer are now offering some hope for improving survival. Still at this time, the mortality rate for lung cancer is still extremely high, and reports of improved response or survival rates using drugs or combinations therapies do not mean cures. Ultimately, the patient must weigh a diminished quality of life using some aggressive treatments against a chance for a modestly prolonged life. Surgical ProceduresSurgery is performed in the following circumstances:
Unfortunately, lung surgery may be too risky for patients with other lung diseases or serious medical conditions, and because lung cancers tend to occur in smokers over 50, such health problems are likely to be present. Long-term survival rates appear to be better in patients treated at hospitals that perform large numbers of lung cancer surgeries, and when surgeries are performed by thoracic surgeons, who specialize in chest procedures. Standard Surgical ProceduresThe type of surgery depends on the amount of lung or other tissue that needs to be removed. Wedge Resection or Segmentectomy. Wedge resection and segmentectomy remove only a small part of the lung; consequently, they preserve almost normal breathing function after the operation. Lobectomy. Removal of one of the lobes of the lung is called lobectomy. The patient's lung function must be adequate before undergoing this procedure. The operation carries an overall mortality rate of 3% to 5%, with older patients having the highest risk. Pneumonectomy. Pneumonectomy removes the entire lung. The procedure itself carries a mortality rate of 5% to 8%, with the oldest patients having the greatest risk. In such patients, recurrence almost always occurs. Other ProceduresSurgical advances are allowing a wider range of options, including minimal surgeries for early cancers and surgeries that relieve cancer symptoms in late stages of the disease. Thoracoscopy. Thoracoscopy is a less-invasive technique that employs a thin tube containing a miniature camera and surgical instruments. It requires much smaller incisions than open surgery and speeds recovery to the point that patients are up within hours. Such procedures can have significant drawbacks, though. For instance, one such operation, the thoracoscopic wedge resection, does not allow the surgeon to fully determine the extent of lymph node involvement or the presence of metastatic disease outside of the lung's lobes. When thoracoscopy is used for a lobectomy, it may offer little advantage in reducing postsurgical pain. Thoracoscopies are also difficult to perform and are still considered experimental. Laser Surgery. Laser surgeries allow removal of minimal amounts of lung tissue and are proving useful for improving symptoms in stage II and IIIA patients. They may also be beneficial in treating cancers that have spread to the throat, obstructing it. Photodynamic Therapy. Photodynamic therapy uses bronchoscopy and special laser light beams combined with a photosensitive drug called porfimer sodium (Photofrin) to kill cancer cells. The most common side effect is sun sensitivity. Serious side effects include bleeding in the lungs. Photodynamic therapy may be considered for patients in early-stage disease who are not candidates for other surgical procedures. It may also be used to reduce symptoms in late-stage disease. Cryosurgery. Cryosurgery uses a probe chilled to below freezing to destroy the tumor cells on contact and is being investigated in combination with radiation therapy. It may also be an alternative in early stage cancer for patients who cannot have surgery. Electric Cauterization. Electric cauterization, the use of electricity to produce heat that destroys tissue, is also under investigation as a treatment for early-stage disease. Back Surgery. Spinal cord compression is a common cause of pain in patients with advanced lung cancer. Because such patients can live for a year or longer, some research indicates that back surgery followed by radiation therapy can significantly improve the quality of life for many of these patients. Radiation TreatmentsIn addition to surgery, radiation is the other primary treatment for early-stage lung cancer. Doctors are also studying the benefits of radiation treatment in advanced lung cancer. Radical Radiation in Early-Stage Cancer. Radical radiation is used as the sole procedure in stage I and some stage II patients who have adequate lung function but, for medical or other reasons, cannot be treated with surgery. In these cases, the 5-year survival rate is about 20%, and the cancer is likely to recur. Survival rates may be higher or lower depending on the tumor size. In general, treatment with radiation therapy alone shows less benefit with larger tumors. A 2002 analysis suggested that the use of radiotherapy after surgery in patients whose tumors had been completely removed might be associated with reduced survival rates. Nevertheless, a recent study confirmed earlier results that show that radiation therapy by itself is as effective surgery in patients who are unable or unwilling to have surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Combined Treatments for Improving Survival in Advanced Cancer. Radiation is also being investigated in various combinations with chemotherapy, surgery, or both. At this time, concurrent radiation treatment plus platinum-based chemotherapy may extend survival times in advanced lung cancer. Other combinations are showing promise. Palliative Radiation. Doctors use palliative radiation to shrink tumors and reduce pain and symptoms. Palliative radiation is appropriate for patients with advanced disease and poor lung functions, or in those with metastasized cancer. In up to 85% of patients with advanced disease, palliative radiation therapy helps relieve pain, shortness of breath, the superior vena cava syndrome, coughing up blood, and symptoms caused by brain metastases. Radiation, in these cases, is not generally used with the intention of reducing mortality rates, although it may increase survival in some patients, such as those with excellent lung function tumors are small. Delaying radiation therapy until symptoms develop does not appear to reduce survival times or impair quality of life compared to starting it right away, in patients with minimal or no symptoms. Radiation Therapy in Metastasis to the Brain. Radiation is the primary treatment when cancer has spread to the brain unless the cancer is small enough to be treated surgically. In such cases, a technique called stereotactic radiosurgery may be employed that delivers powerful, highly targeted radiation to specific areas in the brain. Some trials are investigating using radiation to the head in order to prevent metastasis to the brain. Standard Radiation ProceduresThe goal of radiation treatment is to administer doses as high as possible to kill as many cancer cells as possible, without destroying surrounding healthy tissues or causing a dangerous reaction. Doctors may try different procedures for the same patient. The exact radiation procedure depends on the site of the cancer or how far it has spread:
Hyperfractionated RadiotherapyHyperfractionated radiotherapy administers smaller than standard doses a number of times a day (usually two or three). This allows doctors to give a higher cumulative dose over the whole course of treatment. It is not as useful as therapy by itself, but should be combined with chemotherapy to have any survival benefits. Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy. Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) administers multiple doses per day but uses standard doses. This allows the total dose of radiation to be administered over a shorter time period than the standard six weeks. CHART is proving to extend survival rates of patients with localized cancer over that of standard radiotherapy or non-accelerated hyperfractionated radiation. It can cause severe swallowing problems. A modification in which treatment is suspended for two days out of seven may help reduce this effect. Three-Dimensional Conformal RadiotherapyThree-dimensional (3-D) conformal radiotherapy delivers external-beam radiation designed to closely match the specific targeted organs or tissues. This allows significantly higher doses to attack the cancer while reducing the risk to healthy cells. In a 2003 report, three-year survival rates in stage IIIA patients were nearly 60%, and nearly half the patients experienced no side effects. Stereotactic body radiotherapy, an advance on conformal radiation, uses a body frame and an abdominal press to immobilize the patient's body and limit breath movement. This allows a more accurate delivery of high-energy radiation. The technique is still investigational. Side Effects of Radiation TherapyRadiation can have significant side effects when used as part of intensive treatments, such as hyperfractionated radiotherapy or radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy. Among the most serious problems is severe inflammation in the esophagus (esophagitis) or the lungs (pneumonitis). Infection is also a danger. The use of targeted approaches, such as conformal radiotherapy may help reduce these complications. Investigators are also studying drugs, notably amifostine, that appear to help reduce throat and lung inflammation caused by radiation without reducing its cancer-fighting effects. Treatment Options by StagesOccult StageIn the occult stage (TX, N0, M0), cancer cells are found in a sample of a patient's coughed-up sputum but no cancer cells have yet been detected in the lung. Treatment Options. Surgical removal of the tumor, if one can be located, allows identification of its stage and often results in cure. Stage 0 or Carcinoma in SituStage 0 or carcinoma in situ (Tis, N0, M0) are noninvasive cancers and only a few layers of cancer cells are detected within one local area. The cancer has not grown through to the top lining in the lung and can be surgically removed. There is a high risk for development of a second tumor, however. Treatment Options:
Stage IIn stage I, the cancer has reached higher layers of the lung but has not spread into the lymph nodes or beyond the lung. General Treatment Options. The primary treatment is surgery, such as lobectomy (removal of a whole lobe), if possible. Patients with poor lung function should undergo partial lobectomy if possible. Radiation treatments may be appropriate and beneficial for patients who cannot have surgery. It is not clear if early-stage lung cancer patients, who have radiation or chemotherapy in addition to surgery, have higher survival rates. A 2002 analysis suggested that the use of radiotherapy after surgery in patients whose tumors had been completely removed might be associated with reduced survival rates. An analysis of studies using chemotherapy in addition to surgery or radiotherapy, however, indicated benefits in survival. The overall 5-year survival rates for early stage-cancer are in the range of 30 - 50%. Patients should consider clinical trials for prevention of recurring (returning) cancer after the initial treatment. The risk for recurrence is highest in patients who continue to smoke.
Stage IIIn stage II the cancer cells have spread to nearby lymph nodes. General Treatment Options. Surgery, usually removal of a lobe (lobectomy) or one lung (pneumonectomy) is the treatment of choice. Five-year survival rates associated with stage II surgery can vary. A 2000 review of existing research places the numbers as high as 40 - 50%, but notes that they can drop to 25% and below if the cancer has spread beyond the immediate lymph nodes. Patients whose cancer is inoperable may consider radiation treatments. In patients who can complete treatment, five-year survival rates average 20 - 30%, with higher rates for stage IIA. Patients should consider clinical trials for prevention of recurring cancer after primary treatment. To date, however, supplementing surgical treatment with radiation or chemotherapy does not appear to prolong survival rates.
Stage IIIIn stage III, the cancer cells have spread beyond the lung to the chest wall, diaphragm, or further lymph nodes, such as those in the neck. General Treatment Options. Generally, the treatment of choice for stage III tumors is radiation and sometimes surgery, chemotherapy, or combinations of all three. Combination approaches may be significantly more effective than single treatments. For example, of particular interest is a treatment approach that starts with chemotherapy and radiation, given at the same time, followed by surgery. In one study, 5-year survival in stage III patients treated this way was nearly 50%.
Stage IVIn stage IV (any T, any N, M1), the cancer has spread (metastasized) to other parts of the body. Treatment Options are:
Recurring or Additional New TumorsRecurring or additional new tumors occur, usually in the lung again, in half of treated patients. Research shows that a single tumor in the lung is more often a new tumor that, in many cases, may be operable. Treatment Options are:
Chemotherapy TreatmentsChemotherapy employs drugs given orally or by injection to destroy cancer cells that may have spread beyond the tumor. Until recently, there has been some doubt about the effectiveness of chemotherapy for lung cancer. A major 2002 analysis of 52 trials supported its use, particularly with platinum-based regimens, and with the use of supportive care.
Chemotherapy Drugs and RegimensPowerful platinum compounds, either cisplatin (Platinol) or carboplatin (Paraplatin), are the basis for most chemotherapy regimens. Two-drug combinations, with one drug being a platinum-based agent, are currently the preferred regimens. Reasonable combinations include paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin or cisplatin. This regimen can also include gemcitabine, docetaxel, or vinblastine or its derivative (vindesine or vinorelbine). There does not seem to be any significant differences in effectiveness among them. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination might be a good option for patients who cannot tolerate platinum compounds. Chemotherapy for lung cancer may have reached its peak. Still, investigative chemotherapeutic drugs may yet improve response. Many experts are pinning their hope on agents called biologic response modifiers, such as gefitinib (Iressa) or LY900003 (Affinitak). To date, however, they have not achieved better results than standard platinum-based chemotherapies. Gefitinib (Iressa), a second-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is now available only for a limited group of patients. These patients have benefited from gefitinib in the past, or they are enrolled in a clinical study with the drug. While this medicine initially showed great promise in clinical trials, results from a newer study failed to show that it prolonged survival in advanced lung cancer patients who failed other treatments. If you are currently taking gefitinib, do not stop taking it without talking to your doctor. Erlotinib (Tarceva) is in the same medication class as gefitinib, but it shows very promising results in the treatment of several types of cancers, including NSCLC. Administration, Timing, and Drug SequencesChemotherapy treatments are usually performed in an outpatient setting and in regular cycles for several months. How many chemotherapy cycles to administer in late-stage cancers, the timing of those cycles, and the sequences of the drugs are still matters of investigation. For instance, research suggests that a three- or four-course cycle may achieve the same survival times and better quality of life than the standard of six or more course cycles. Changing even one day in a drug sequence can sometimes significantly affect outcome. Such fine-tuning of chemotherapy regimens is likely to have the most effect on patients with advanced-stage disease, which requires more tailored treatment than doses early-stage disease. ![]() Treatment for lung cancer depends on the type of cancer and the stage of the disease. Chemotherapy is a form of treatment for lung cancer which may cure, shrink or keep the cancer from spreading. Side EffectsSide effects of chemotherapy treatments are common, and they are more severe with higher doses. Side effects increase over the course of treatment. Some trials suggest that they can be reduced by giving the drugs for shorter durations, without loss of cancer-killing effects. Common side effects include the following:
These side effects are nearly always temporary. Most patients are able to continue with normal activities for all but perhaps one or two days per month. Serious complications of chemotherapy can also occur and may vary depending on the specific drugs. They include the following:
Second-Line ChemotherapySecond-line chemotherapy is used for patients whose cancers have recurred after first-line chemotherapy. Some experts believe that longer survival rates for advanced lung cancer we have seen for the past 5 years may be due to these drugs. Because platinum-based agents are most often used first, they are not beneficial for second-line therapy. The following are commonly used second-line agents. Docetaxel (Taxotere). Docetaxel is the drug of choice at this time for cancers that do not respond to initial chemotherapy. Studies have reported that it achieves longer survival times than supportive care alone. It is usually given every 21 days. This regimen causes more side effects than pemetrexed, the newer major second-line drug. Weekly doses of docetaxel are effective and less toxic than the 3-week schedule. It is not clear if survival rates are comparable to those of pemetrexed with that schedule, however. Pemetrexed (Alimta). Pemetrexed, known as an anti-folate, is another promising new agent for second-line therapy and possibly for first-line treatment as well. The drug targets a number of enzymes that play a role in cancer cells increase. Some research suggests that it is as effective as docetaxel. Pemetrexed does have some serious toxic effects, but they can be significantly reduced with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements. It is then less toxic than docetaxel, when docetaxel is given every 21 days, but not when it is given weekly Gefitinib (Iressa) and Other Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Much research is focusing drugs that block small molecules involved with the growth of blood vessels that feed the tumor (a process called angiogenesis). The spread of new blood vessels is controlled by compounds called growth factors, which may be important in cancer cell proliferation. Researchers, then, are interested in agents that literally turn off these growth factors or their receptors, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In so doing, the agents may be able to cut off cancer's life blood. Gefitinib and erlotinib are angiogenesis inhibitors that target receptors of an epidermal growth factor called tyrosine kinase.
Combinations of Chemotherapy with Surgery, Radiation Therapy, or BothChemotherapy Following Surgery (Adjuvant Chemotherapy). Chemotherapy is being evaluated in combination with surgery, radiation therapy, or both. Fairly strong evidence is now supporting the use of platinum-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment after surgery in patients with lung cancers in stages Ib-IIIa, with some research indicating a 5% improvement in five-year survival rates. Not all studies confirm survival benefits, however, and trials are ongoing. Chemotherapy before Surgery (Induction Chemotherapy). Some researchers are testing induction chemotherapy, which is used to shrink potentially operable tumors before surgery. Studies have been mixed in reporting any survival benefits in patients with advanced lung cancer. Combined and Multi-Modal Therapy. In stage III cancers, investigators are researching very intensive treatments that use two or more combinations of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. For example, radiation plus chemotherapy may be helpful in patients whose tumors are surgically removable. In inoperable lung cancer, combining radiation with chemotherapy is proving to prolong the time to recurrence, the overall duration of survival, or both, compared to radiation alone. Evidence also suggests that giving radiation treatments at the same time as chemotherapy (instead of in separate cycles) improves 5-year survival rates, compared to a sequential approach (separate cycles following each other). Chemotherapy and radiation treatments given at the same time are more toxic, however. Other approaches use even more intensive multi-modal therapy. For example, some trials use radiation therapy with chemotherapy, followed by surgery. Patients are then sometimes given additional chemotherapy or radiation. In other promising regimens, patents are given concurrent radiation and chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy alone. Such approaches are very toxic but appear to improve survival in selected patients. Severe inflammation in the esophagus is the most common severe side effect of the radiation and chemotherapy combination. There is also a very high risk of serious infections, including pneumonia, herpes zoster, and cytomegalovirus. Long-term antibiotic therapy may be needed. Although patients over 70 may suffer more from toxic effects than younger patients, studies now suggest that they can achieve survival rates with combined treatments that are equal to those in younger patients. Agents Used for Pain ReliefThere are many painkilling medications available. Research shows that aggressive pain relief can help patients manage cancer treatment symptoms (in addition to pain) better. For example, a 2001 study suggested that reducing pain in elderly cancer patients markedly lowered their fatigue levels, and improved other symptoms as well. Opioids are the most potent pain killers. The correct use of these strong medications is very important for reaching acceptable pain relief, and preventing a toxic response. For example, the long-lasting version of oxycodone (OxyContin) must be swallowed whole; chewing, inhaling, or injecting it can create a deadly overdose. Investigative AgentsAccording to a 2001 article, of the nearly 500 cancer drugs currently in development, 58 of them (about 13%) are aimed at fighting lung cancer. Only the number of breast cancer drugs exceeded that percentage. Unfortunately, none to date have shown any real benefit in terms of patient survival. However, some drugs are showing promise, and at this time, these agents are best hope for improving lung cancer survival rates. Monoclonal Antibodies (MAbs)Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are genetically designed immune factors. MAbs mark foreign compounds called antigens for attack by the immune system. Trastuzumab (Herceptin), cetuximab (Erbitux), and bevacizumab (Avastin) are MAbs under investigation. All three block epidermal growth factor. These agents are of particular interest for patients who have cancers that overexpress a protein called HER2. Trials showing some promise use these agents in combination with chemotherapies and newer drugs, such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors. For example, results from an ongoing study show the disease-free survival time in patients with advanced NSCLC is longer when adding bevacizumab to erlotinib (Tarceva) or to chemotherapy. Antisense OligonucleotideAntisense oligonucleotides are drugs that are being used to block molecules that result in too many cells that cause cancers. LY900003 (Affinitak), for example, targets an enzyme called PKC-alpha, which promotes tumor growth. Early studies showed some promising results although a 2003 study found no difference in effectiveness when used in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to the chemotherapy alone. Oblimersen (G3139) blocks BCL-2, another protein that is genetically overexpressed in some cancers, is also under investigation. Genetic TherapyAdvexin, a genetic therapy that contains the p53 tumor-suppressor gene is showing promise. In one early study, 60% of patients experienced partial or total tumor shrinkage when the agent was used in combination with radiation therapy. VaccinesVaccines use inactivated genetic materials from cancer cells, such as defective p53 or ras genes, to cause a highly targeted immune response to attack the cancer. RetinoidsRetinoids are vitamin A-like antioxidant chemicals that help repair cell damage and appear to support growth of lung cells. A number of retinoid-like agents (retinal palmitate, TAC-101, 23-cis-retinoic acid, N-acetyl-cysteine) are being studied for the treatment or prevention of lung cancer Resources
ReferencesMehra R, Moore BA, Crothers K, Tetrault J, Fiellin DA. The association between marijuana smoking and lung cancer: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jul 10;166(13):1359-67. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 2006. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Lung cancer screening. Ann Int Med. 2004;140:738-739. Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Niederhuber JE, Kastan MB, McKena WG. Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Orlando, Fl: Churchill Livingstone; 2004:1690-1701.
Review Date:
6/30/2006 Reviewed By: Harvey Simon, MD, Editor-in-Chief, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital. The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997-
A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||